Secure Strong Representation with Nathan Prince

Law Office of Nathan Prince

5.0

Over 20 5-Star Reviews

Accolades in Criminal Justice
  • National College for DUI Defense
  • FACDL

    Serving Tallahassee, Tallahassee and beyond Multiple Dui Lawyer Tallahassee

    Facing charges for multiple DUI offenses is a serious matter that demands immediate action and skilled legal representation. In such circumstances, hiring a seasoned multiple DUI attorney is not just advisable; it's essential. Conviction of multiple DUI can result in heightened consequences including license suspension or revocation, significant fines, mandatory substance abuse treatment, and jail time.

    At Law Office of Nathan Prince, we have the experience and resources needed to navigate the complexities of multiple offense DUI cases effectively. When you work with our firm, we will meticulously examine the details surrounding your case, identify any procedural errors or violations of your rights, and develop a strategic defense tailored to your situation. Rest assured that we will work tirelessly to minimize the impact on your life and future, fighting for reduced charges or alternative sentencing options whenever possible.

    Take control of your future today by calling (850) 601-5690 to see how a multiple DUI lawyer can help you.

    Tallahassee Multiple Offense DUI
    Call for More Information Today!
    850-601-5690
    Real Feedback, Real Defenders
    • P
      "Merry Christmas and Happy New Year"
      Merry Christmas, sir, and Happy New Year from Prince Onofomi Ovie.
      Prince Ovie Onofomi
    • R
      "Highly Recommend This Law Firm"
      Extremely competent and knowledgeable law firm. Nathan and Allison were helpful and responsive.
      Raquel Shabazz
    • M
      "Goes Out of His Way to Show He Cares"
      Extremely helpful and goes way out of his way to make sure you know he cares!
      Michelle McAnally
    • P
      "Exceptional Legal Services"
      Nathan's expertise and dedication were evident.
      Phillip Spencer
    • L
      "Professional, Knowledgeable, and Kind"
      Mr. Prince was able to get the judgment vacated and the case transferred to Veterans Treatment Court.
      LeiNatai B
    Merry Christmas and Happy New Year
    Merry Christmas, sir, and Happy New Year from Prince Onofomi Ovie. My person is this year, mining. I am 2026. The year, my Bible, he are God. Thank you all. Prince Ovie Onofomi.
    Prince Ovie Onofomi
    Highly Recommend This Law Firm
    Extremely competent and knowledgeable law firm. Nathan and Allison were helpful and responsive. I highly recommend this law firm!
    Raquel Shabazz
    Goes Out of His Way to Show He Cares
    Extremely helpful and goes way out of his way to make sure you know he cares! I would give him a 10-star rating if I could! Thank you for all you do, Nathan Prince!
    Michelle McAnally
    Exceptional Legal Services
    I'm pleased to share my experience with the Law Office of Nathan Prince. Nathan provided invaluable service and guidance to one of my employees and went above and beyond by connecting us with other attorneys for specialized issues. Nathan's expertise and dedication were evident throughout our interactions, and his referrals were spot-on. We're truly grateful for his support and highly recommend Nathan Prince and the Law Office of Nathan Prince for their exceptional legal services.
    Phillip Spencer
    Professional, Knowledgeable, and Kind
    I engaged Mr. Prince on behalf of my son, an honorable veteran, who had been convicted of criminal charges due to his previous attorney's negligence. Mr. Prince was able to get the judgment vacated and the case transferred to Veterans Treatment Court with the possibility of expungement upon completion. My son was able to complete the program in 6 months, reducing his probation time by almost a year! Mr. Prince and his staff were professional, knowledgeable, and kind. The reason I gave a 4 vice 5 is that communication/responsiveness was sometimes lacking.
    LeiNatai B
    Our Results
    • Not Guilty 1st Degree Murder
      VB was charged with first degree murder following an alleged gang related shooting and was originally facing the death ...
    • Not Guilty 1st Degree Murder
      JP was charged with First Degree Murder and Possession of a Firearm by a Convicted Felon after he allegedly shot his ...
    • Not Guilty 1st Degree Murder
      PL was charged with Attempted First Degree Murder with a Firearm, Attempted Armed Robbery with a Firearm, and Aggravated ...
    • Not Guilty Aggravated Assault
      JC had no criminal history, but was charged with committing an aggravated assault with a firearm on a law enforcement ...
    • Dismissed Armed Robbery
      WR was charged with double Armed Robbery with a Firearm. He was alleged to have held two people at gun point, pressing ...
    • Not Guilty Attempted Murder
      CM was a prison release re-offender (recently released from prison and facing a mandatory life sentence) and prison gang ...
    Not Guilty 1st Degree Murder
    VB was charged with first degree murder following an alleged gang related shooting and was originally facing the death penalty. Attorney Prince convinced the State to seek only life in prison without the possibility of parole prior to trial. At trial, the State alleged that VB, a member of the “Bloods” criminal street gang, observed the victim, who was a member of the “Crypts” criminal street gang, walking on her street one afternoon. In broad daylight and in front of many people, VB was alleged to have approached the victim and ordered him to leave her “set” or territory. When the victim refused, the witnesses all claimed that VB produced a firearm and shot him in the chest. The witnesses also claimed that, as the victim laid dying on the ground, VB stood over the victim and fired another shot into his body. VB then fled the scene. VB was later apprehended hiding out at a hotel. The firearm that had been used to shoot the victim was found in VB’s possession. Forensic analysis would later reveal that VB’s DNA was on the firearm, and would likewise demonstrate that when the second shot fired was into the victim he had indeed been laying prone on the ground. When confronted with the evidence, VB offered a full, detailed video-taped confession. Notwithstanding the evidence against VB, Attorney Prince succeeded in obtaining a NOT GUILTY verdict on the murder charge.
    Not Guilty 1st Degree Murder
    JP was charged with First Degree Murder and Possession of a Firearm by a Convicted Felon after he allegedly shot his girlfriend’s husband six times, killing him. JP was facing the death penalty, but the Attorney Prince convinced the State to only seek life in prison without the possibility of parole shortly before trial. At trial, the State alleged that JP had been engaged in a sexual relationship with a married woman who had separated from her husband. The witnesses agreed that on the night of the shooting, the victim came to his estranged wife’s residence in order to drop his son off. During the visit, the victim informed JP that he was going to get back together with his wife and told JP that he would need to pack his belongings and leave the residence immediately. The victim then left the residence, indicating that he would return shortly and that, when he did, JP would need to be gone. Once the victim left the residence, JP called his brother on the phone stating that he “needed some fire,” which meant that he needed a gun. JP admitted during the trial that his brother did in fact bring him the firearm before the victim returned to the residence. Later that evening, the victim did return to the residence, reiterating that it was time for JP to go. When the victim approached the porch where JP was seated, JP pulled the gun from his waistband and began firing. The victim was shot six times, including a fatal strike to the back. In addition to admitting that he shot the victim and that he possessed the firearm prior to the victim returning to the residence, JP admitted that he was an eleven time convicted felon during his testimony at trial. At the end of the four day trial, Attorney Prince obtained NOT GUILTY verdicts on both charges in a matter of minutes. Notwithstanding his acquittal, JP was not immediately set free because he was being held on other felony charges. Three weeks after JP was acquitted on the first degree murder and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon charges, Attorney Prince succeeded in getting the remaining felony charges dismissed by filing a motion to dismiss. JP was reunited with his family, returned to work, and now appreciates his freedom every day. JP remains close with Attorney Prince.
    Not Guilty 1st Degree Murder

    PL was charged with Attempted First Degree Murder with a Firearm, Attempted Armed Robbery with a Firearm, and Aggravated Battery with a Firearm. The alleged victim claimed that he was waiting outside a mall with over a dozen other people anticipating the release of the new “Air Jordan” shoes when PL approached him brandishing a firearm. According to the alleged victim, PL demanded his wallet then immediately struck him in the head with the firearm, knocking him to the ground. The alleged victim asserted that he then leapt to his feet and ran for his life, at which point PL began firing at him. The bullets struck the vehicle the alleged victim was hiding behind and several spent shell casings were ultimately obtained by law enforcement. PL then fled the scene. Many of the witnesses attended the same high school as PL several years before the alleged offense and were able to immediately identify him by name when law enforcement arrived on scene. Moreover, surveillance footage from a nearby gas station clearly depicted PL. When PL was arrested later that day, he was found in possession of the magazine clip and ammunition which matched the shell casings at the scene. PL admitted that he struck the victim and attempted to rob him. Notwithstanding the evidence, Attorney Prince prevented the jury from finding PL guilty of ANY of the charged offenses.

    Not Guilty Aggravated Assault

    JC had no criminal history, but was charged with committing an aggravated assault with a firearm on a law enforcement officer, which is a “10-20-Life” offense which requires a minimum mandatory sentence in state prison. The alleged victim, who was an off duty law enforcement officer, claimed that JC became enraged after he accidently cut him off in traffic. The officer testified that JC followed his unmarked vehicle, honking, making obscene gestures, and swerving erratically from lane to lane. The officer explained that JC ultimately pulled up along-side his vehicle, pointing a firearm at him and yelling. The officer claimed that he slammed on his brakes and took evasive action to get away from JC. At trial, Attorney Prince exposed the officer as a racist who had used the “N-word” as a slur against JC, who was a young African-American male. The jury wasted no time in finding JC NOT GUILTY.

    Dismissed Armed Robbery

    WR was charged with double Armed Robbery with a Firearm. He was alleged to have held two people at gun point, pressing the gun against one of the victim’s heads as he robbed them. As WR fled the scene on foot, police responded to the scene with K-9 units. The K-9’s successfully tracked WR through the forest and forcibly secured his surrender. The firearm used in the robbery, as well as the stolen property, was found by law enforcement as they tracked his escape route. Once he was arrested, the victims both identified WR as the assailant. WR was later released, however, so that the police could conduct DNA testing on the firearm and stolen property discarded along WR’s escape path. Ultimately, the evidence was linked to WR and he was placed in custody and held without bond for a year and a half while he awaited trial. During the first year and a half his case was pending, WR was represented by another attorney. WR hired Attorney Prince because he got scared as the case neared trial. After taking the case over, Attorney Prince immediately recognized a technical speedy trial violation created by the fact that WR was arrested, released, and later re-arrested after more than 175 days had passed. Attorney Prince filed a motion for discharge, which the State Attorney vehemently opposed. However, the judge was required to dismiss all charges. WR was immediately released.

    Not Guilty Attempted Murder

    CM was a prison release re-offender (recently released from prison and facing a mandatory life sentence) and prison gang member who was charged with Attempted First Degree murder after he allegedly stabbed a young man at a night club. The alleged victim with an investigator for the public defender’s office who was trained in police investigative tactics. He was at a night club with friends when he accidently bumped into CM. CM demanded the alleged victim explain “what his problem was” at which point the alleged victim explained that it was merely an accident. The alleged victim then turned around to leave when he felt a sharp strike to his back. He turned back around to face CM and asked why CM had punched him in the back. CM allegedly responded “No, bro… not a punch” holding up a blood covered knife. All of the alleged victim’s friends confirmed his version of the events and identified CM as the assailant. CM was especially easy to identify because of the distinctive prison tattoos on his face, which the alleged victim carefully described based on his investigative experience. Notwithstanding the clear identification by all the witnesses, Attorney Prince obtained a four minute NOT GUILTY verdict for CM after three days of trial testimony by the State witnesses. CM was immediately freed from jail. He moved out of state, got engaged, and had a little girl. CM also continued to pursue his music career, and is an emerging rapper who was recently signed by a record label. CM remains in close contact with Attorney Prince.

    Why Choose Law Office of Nathan Prince

    At the Law Office of Nathan Prince, we specialize in delivering strategic criminal defense in Tallahassee and surrounding areas. With a wealth of experience, our team is committed to providing exceptional representation, focusing on achieving the best possible outcomes for our clients. We are available anytime to support you through legal challenges.

    Why Choose Us:

    • Handled over 2,500 criminal cases with proven results
    • Insightful legal strategies from a former prosecutor
    • Available 24/7 for client support and queries
    • Expert representation in both state and federal courts
    • Dedicated to transparent and informed client communication
    • State and Federal Court Expertise

      Licensed to defend in all court levels.

    • Unique Insider Prosecutorial Insights

      Former prosecutor for strategic advantage.

    • Available 24/7 for Your Defense

      Round-the-clock commitment to clients.

    • Proven Success in Over 2,500 Cases

      Extensive experience for your defense.

    Meet Our Committed Law Office of Nathan Prince

    At the Law Office of Nathan Prince, we are dedicated to providing exceptional criminal defense services throughout Tallahassee and beyond. With over 2,500 cases handled, we bring extensive experience and a strategic edge to each case. Our attorney, Nathan Prince, leverages his former prosecutorial experience to offer a unique perspective, benefiting our clients in both state and federal courts. We specialize in areas including DUI and drug offenses, and are committed to around-the-clock accessibility, ensuring our clients always have the support they need. Trust in our proven approach and dedication to achieving the best possible outcomes for our clients.

    Criminal Law Explained
    • What qualifies as a multiple offense DUI?
      A multiple offense DUI occurs when an individual is charged with more than one DUI offense within a certain time period. This time frame varies by jurisdiction but typically ranges from five to ten years. The penalties increase significantly with each repeat offense.
    • Can multiple DUI offenses be expunged?
      Expungement of DUI offenses depends on the law in your state. Some states allow expungement of DUI records under specific conditions, often requiring a certain period without any further offenses. It's essential to consult with an attorney to understand your state's laws and eligibility for expungement.
    • What is an ignition interlock device?
      An ignition interlock device is a breathalyzer connected to a vehicle's ignition system. Drivers must provide a breath sample before starting the car. If alcohol is detected, the vehicle will not start. Installation is often mandated for drivers with multiple DUI offenses to prevent recidivism.
    • How does a multiple DUI affect auto insurance?
      Having multiple DUIs often leads to significantly higher auto insurance rates due to the increased risk perceived by insurers. In some cases, drivers may struggle to find a provider willing to offer coverage. SR-22 insurance might be required, which can also further impact costs.
    Common Areas We Serve
    • Tallahassee
    • Leon County
    • Bradfordville
    • Woodville
    • Capitola
    • Midway
    • Lloyd
    • Havana
    • Wakulla Springs
    Call Us Today! 850-601-5690
    or Contact
    Talk to a Criminal Defense Expert
    • By submitting, you agree to receive text messages from Law Office of Nathan Prince at the number provided, including those related to your inquiry, follow-ups, and review requests, via automated technology. Consent is not a condition of purchase. Msg & data rates may apply. Msg frequency may vary. Reply STOP to cancel or HELP for assistance. Acceptable Use Policy