Serving Tallahassee, Tallahassee and beyond
Defense Attorney Tallahassee
If you are facing criminal charges, it is imperative to begin building your defense right away. Navigating the criminal justice system can be daunting and complicated, which is why you need a seasoned criminal defense lawyer on your side. At Law Office of Nathan Prince, we understand the challenges you face.
We can provide comprehensive legal support and build a defense strategy that is tailored to your situation. We will assess every aspect of your case, develop a strong defense, and protect your rights at every turn. We recognize the impact criminal charges can have on your life and will work diligently to obtain the most favorable outcome possible.
There’s too much at stake to delay. Call our firm at (850) 601-5690 to see how a criminal defense attorney can help.
Tallahassee Criminal Defense Call for More Information Today!850-601-5690
Extremely competent and knowledgeable law firm. Nathan and Allison were helpful and responsive.
Raquel Shabazz
M"Goes Out of His Way to Show He Cares"
Extremely helpful and goes way out of his way to make sure you know he cares!
Michelle McAnally
P"Exceptional Legal Services"
Nathan's expertise and dedication were evident.
Phillip Spencer
L"Professional, Knowledgeable, and Kind"
Mr. Prince was able to get the judgment vacated and the case transferred to Veterans Treatment Court.
LeiNatai B
Highly Recommend This Law Firm
Extremely competent and knowledgeable law firm. Nathan and Allison were helpful and responsive. I highly recommend this law firm!
Raquel Shabazz
Goes Out of His Way to Show He Cares
Extremely helpful and goes way out of his way to make sure you know he cares! I would give him a 10-star rating if I could! Thank you for all you do, Nathan Prince!
Michelle McAnally
Exceptional Legal Services
I'm pleased to share my experience with the Law Office of Nathan Prince. Nathan provided invaluable service and guidance to one of my employees and went above and beyond by connecting us with other attorneys for specialized issues. Nathan's expertise and dedication were evident throughout our interactions, and his referrals were spot-on. We're truly grateful for his support and highly recommend Nathan Prince and the Law Office of Nathan Prince for their exceptional legal services.
Phillip Spencer
Professional, Knowledgeable, and Kind
I engaged Mr. Prince on behalf of my son, an honorable veteran, who had been convicted of criminal charges due to his previous attorney's negligence. Mr. Prince was able to get the judgment vacated and the case transferred to Veterans Treatment Court with the possibility of expungement upon completion. My son was able to complete the program in 6 months, reducing his probation time by almost a year! Mr. Prince and his staff were professional, knowledgeable, and kind. The reason I gave a 4 vice 5 is that communication/responsiveness was sometimes lacking.
VB was charged with first degree murder following an alleged gang related shooting and was originally facing the death ...
Not Guilty1st Degree Murder
JP was charged with First Degree Murder and Possession of a Firearm by a Convicted Felon after he allegedly shot his ...
Not Guilty1st Degree Murder
PL was charged with Attempted First Degree Murder with a Firearm, Attempted Armed Robbery with a Firearm, and Aggravated ...
Not GuiltyAggravated Assault
JC had no criminal history, but was charged with committing an aggravated assault with a firearm on a law enforcement ...
DismissedArmed Robbery
WR was charged with double Armed Robbery with a Firearm. He was alleged to have held two people at gun point, pressing ...
Not GuiltyAttempted Murder
CM was a prison release re-offender (recently released from prison and facing a mandatory life sentence) and prison gang ...
Not Guilty1st Degree Murder
VB was charged with first degree murder following an alleged gang related shooting and was originally facing the death penalty. Attorney Prince convinced the State to seek only life in prison without the possibility of parole prior to trial. At trial, the State alleged that VB, a member of the “Bloods” criminal street gang, observed the victim, who was a member of the “Crypts” criminal street gang, walking on her street one afternoon. In broad daylight and in front of many people, VB was alleged to have approached the victim and ordered him to leave her “set” or territory. When the victim refused, the witnesses all claimed that VB produced a firearm and shot him in the chest. The witnesses also claimed that, as the victim laid dying on the ground, VB stood over the victim and fired another shot into his body. VB then fled the scene. VB was later apprehended hiding out at a hotel. The firearm that had been used to shoot the victim was found in VB’s possession. Forensic analysis would later reveal that VB’s DNA was on the firearm, and would likewise demonstrate that when the second shot fired was into the victim he had indeed been laying prone on the ground. When confronted with the evidence, VB offered a full, detailed video-taped confession. Notwithstanding the evidence against VB, Attorney Prince succeeded in obtaining a NOT GUILTY verdict on the murder charge.
Not Guilty1st Degree Murder
JP was charged with First Degree Murder and Possession of a Firearm by
a Convicted Felon after he allegedly shot his girlfriend’s husband
six times, killing him. JP was facing the death penalty, but the Attorney
Prince convinced the State to only seek life in prison without the possibility
of parole shortly before trial. At trial, the State alleged that JP had
been engaged in a sexual relationship with a married woman who had separated
from her husband. The witnesses agreed that on the night of the shooting,
the victim came to his estranged wife’s residence in order to drop
his son off. During the visit, the victim informed JP that he was going
to get back together with his wife and told JP that he would need to pack
his belongings and leave the residence immediately. The victim then left
the residence, indicating that he would return shortly and that, when
he did, JP would need to be gone. Once the victim left the residence,
JP called his brother on the phone stating that he “needed some
fire,” which meant that he needed a gun. JP admitted during the
trial that his brother did in fact bring him the firearm before the victim
returned to the residence. Later that evening, the victim did return to
the residence, reiterating that it was time for JP to go. When the victim
approached the porch where JP was seated, JP pulled the gun from his waistband
and began firing. The victim was shot six times, including a fatal strike
to the back. In addition to admitting that he shot the victim and that
he possessed the firearm prior to the victim returning to the residence,
JP admitted that he was an eleven time convicted felon during his testimony
at trial. At the end of the four day trial, Attorney Prince obtained NOT
GUILTY verdicts on both charges in a matter of minutes. Notwithstanding
his acquittal, JP was not immediately set free because he was being held
on other felony charges. Three weeks after JP was acquitted on the first
degree murder and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon charges,
Attorney Prince succeeded in getting the remaining felony charges dismissed
by filing a motion to dismiss. JP was reunited with his family, returned
to work, and now appreciates his freedom every day. JP remains close with
Attorney Prince.
Not Guilty1st Degree Murder
PL was charged with Attempted First Degree Murder with a Firearm, Attempted
Armed Robbery with a Firearm, and Aggravated Battery with a Firearm. The
alleged victim claimed that he was waiting outside a mall with over a
dozen other people anticipating the release of the new “Air Jordan”
shoes when PL approached him brandishing a firearm. According to the alleged
victim, PL demanded his wallet then immediately struck him in the head
with the firearm, knocking him to the ground. The alleged victim asserted
that he then leapt to his feet and ran for his life, at which point PL
began firing at him. The bullets struck the vehicle the alleged victim
was hiding behind and several spent shell casings were ultimately obtained
by law enforcement. PL then fled the scene. Many of the witnesses attended
the same high school as PL several years before the alleged offense and
were able to immediately identify him by name when law enforcement arrived
on scene. Moreover, surveillance footage from a nearby gas station clearly
depicted PL. When PL was arrested later that day, he was found in possession
of the magazine clip and ammunition which matched the shell casings at
the scene. PL admitted that he struck the victim and attempted to rob
him. Notwithstanding the evidence, Attorney Prince prevented the jury
from finding PL guilty of ANY of the charged offenses.
Not GuiltyAggravated Assault
JC had no criminal history, but was charged with committing an aggravated assault with a firearm on a law enforcement officer, which is a “10-20-Life” offense which requires a minimum mandatory sentence in state prison. The alleged victim, who was an off duty law enforcement officer, claimed that JC became enraged after he accidently cut him off in traffic. The officer testified that JC followed his unmarked vehicle, honking, making obscene gestures, and swerving erratically from lane to lane. The officer explained that JC ultimately pulled up along-side his vehicle, pointing a firearm at him and yelling. The officer claimed that he slammed on his brakes and took evasive action to get away from JC. At trial, Attorney Prince exposed the officer as a racist who had used the “N-word” as a slur against JC, who was a young African-American male. The jury wasted no time in finding JC NOT GUILTY.
DismissedArmed Robbery
WR was charged with double Armed Robbery with a Firearm. He was alleged
to have held two people at gun point, pressing the gun against one of
the victim’s heads as he robbed them. As WR fled the scene on foot,
police responded to the scene with K-9 units. The K-9’s successfully
tracked WR through the forest and forcibly secured his surrender. The
firearm used in the robbery, as well as the stolen property, was found
by law enforcement as they tracked his escape route. Once he was arrested,
the victims both identified WR as the assailant. WR was later released,
however, so that the police could conduct DNA testing on the firearm and
stolen property discarded along WR’s escape path. Ultimately, the
evidence was linked to WR and he was placed in custody and held without
bond for a year and a half while he awaited trial. During the first year
and a half his case was pending, WR was represented by another attorney.
WR hired Attorney Prince because he got scared as the case neared trial.
After taking the case over, Attorney Prince immediately recognized a technical
speedy trial violation created by the fact that WR was arrested, released,
and later re-arrested after more than 175 days had passed. Attorney Prince
filed a motion for discharge, which the State Attorney vehemently opposed.
However, the judge was required to dismiss all charges. WR was immediately released.
Not GuiltyAttempted Murder
CM was a prison release re-offender (recently released from prison and facing a mandatory life sentence) and prison gang member who was charged with Attempted First Degree murder after he allegedly stabbed a young man at a night club. The alleged victim with an investigator for the public defender’s office who was trained in police investigative tactics. He was at a night club with friends when he accidently bumped into CM. CM demanded the alleged victim explain “what his problem was” at which point the alleged victim explained that it was merely an accident. The alleged victim then turned around to leave when he felt a sharp strike to his back. He turned back around to face CM and asked why CM had punched him in the back. CM allegedly responded “No, bro… not a punch” holding up a blood covered knife. All of the alleged victim’s friends confirmed his version of the events and identified CM as the assailant. CM was especially easy to identify because of the distinctive prison tattoos on his face, which the alleged victim carefully described based on his investigative experience. Notwithstanding the clear identification by all the witnesses, Attorney Prince obtained a four minute NOT GUILTY verdict for CM after three days of trial testimony by the State witnesses. CM was immediately freed from jail. He moved out of state, got engaged, and had a little girl. CM also continued to pursue his music career, and is an emerging rapper who was recently signed by a record label. CM remains in close contact with Attorney Prince.
Why Choose Law Office of Nathan Prince
At the Law Office of Nathan Prince, we specialize in delivering strategic criminal defense in Tallahassee and surrounding areas. With a wealth of experience, our team is committed to providing exceptional representation, focusing on achieving the best possible outcomes for our clients. We are available anytime to support you through legal challenges.
Why Choose Us:
Handled over 2,500 criminal cases with proven results
Insightful legal strategies from a former prosecutor
Available 24/7 for client support and queries
Expert representation in both state and federal courts
Dedicated to transparent and informed client communication
State and Federal Court Expertise
Licensed to defend in all court levels.
Unique Insider Prosecutorial Insights
Former prosecutor for strategic advantage.
Available 24/7 for Your Defense
Round-the-clock commitment to clients.
Proven Success in Over 2,500 Cases
Extensive experience for your defense.
Meet Our Committed Law Office of Nathan Prince
At the Law Office of Nathan Prince, we are dedicated to providing exceptional criminal defense services throughout Tallahassee and beyond. With over 2,500 cases handled, we bring extensive experience and a strategic edge to each case. Our attorney, Nathan Prince, leverages his former prosecutorial experience to offer a unique perspective, benefiting our clients in both state and federal courts. We specialize in areas including DUI and drug offenses, and are committed to around-the-clock accessibility, ensuring our clients always have the support they need. Trust in our proven approach and dedication to achieving the best possible outcomes for our clients.
A plea bargain is an agreement between you and the prosecutor where you plead guilty to a lesser charge in exchange for a reduced sentence or dropping other charges. It can be a strategic decision to avoid trial, but it's important to discuss the implications with your attorney before agreeing.
What happens during a criminal trial?
During a criminal trial, both the prosecution and the defense present evidence and arguments. It involves jury selection, opening statements, witness testimonies, cross-examinations, closing arguments, and jury deliberation. The verdict is delivered based on the evidence presented. Our team will guide you through every step of the process.
How can I schedule a consultation?
To schedule a consultation, you can call us directly or fill out the contact form on our website. We provide consultations to discuss the details of your case and outline potential defense strategies. Our team is here to offer guidance and answer your questions.
What types of cases do you handle?
We handle a wide range of criminal cases, including DUI, drug offenses, assault, theft, white-collar crimes, and more. Our team has experience in both misdemeanor and felony cases, providing tailored defense strategies for each unique situation.